Risk Management and Healthcare Policy (Mar 2024)
External Vs Internal e-Referrals: Results from a Nationwide Epidemiological Study Utilizing Secondary Collected Data
Abstract
Nawfal A Aljerian,1,2 Abdullah A Alharbi,3 Hani A Alghamdi,4 Meshary S Binhotan,5,6 Reem S AlOmar,7 Ali K Alsultan,1 Mohammed S Arafat,1 Abdulrahman Aldhabib,1 Mohammed K Alabdulaali1 1Medical Referrals Centre, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 2Emergency Medicine Department, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 3Family and Community Medicine Department, Jazan University, Jazan, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Family and Community Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 5Emergency Medical Services Department, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 6King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; 7Department of Family and Community Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Hani A Alghamdi, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O Box 12372, Riyadh, 7065, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Tel +966507022266, Email [email protected]: E-referral systems, streamlining patient access to specialists, have gained global recognition yet lacked a comparative study between internal and external referrals in Saudi Arabia (KSA).Methods: This retrospective study utilized secondary data from the Saudi Medical Appointments and Referrals Centre system. The data covers 2020 and 2021, including socio-demographic data, referral characteristics, and specialties. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with external referrals.Results: Out of 645,425 e-referrals from more than 300 hospitals, 19.87% were external. The northern region led with 48.65%. Males were 55%, and those aged 25– 64 were 56.68% of referrals. Outpatient clinic referrals comprised 47%, while 61% of referrals were due to a lack of specialty services. Several significant determinants are associated with higher rates of external referral with (p-value < 0.001) and a 95% Confidence interval. Younger individuals under 25 exhibit higher referral rates than those aged 25– 64. Geographically, compared to the central region, in descending order, there were increasing trends of external referral in the northern, western, and southern regions, respectively (OR = 19.26, OR = 4.48, OR 3.63). External referrals for outpatient departments (OPD) and dialysis services were higher than for routine admissions (OR = 1.38, OR = 1.26). The rate of external referrals due to the lack of available equipment was more predominant than other causes. Furthermore, in descending order, external referrals for organ transplantation and oncology are more frequent than for medical specialties, respectively (OR = 9.39, OR = 4.50).Conclusion: The study reveals trends in e-referrals within the KSA, noting regional differences, demographic factors, and types of specialties regarding external referrals, benefiting the New Model of Care for the 2030 Vision. Findings suggest expanding virtual consultations to reduce external referrals. Strengthening primary care and preventive medicine could also decrease future referrals. Future studies should assess resource distribution, including infrastructure and workforce, to further inform healthcare strategy.Keywords: e-referrals, health policy, epidemiology, public health
