AIP Advances (Jun 2014)

Correlating electroluminescence characterization and physics-based models of InGaN/GaN LEDs: Pitfalls and open issues

  • Marco Calciati,
  • Michele Goano,
  • Francesco Bertazzi,
  • Marco Vallone,
  • Xiangyu Zhou,
  • Giovanni Ghione,
  • Matteo Meneghini,
  • Gaudenzio Meneghesso,
  • Enrico Zanoni,
  • Enrico Bellotti,
  • Giovanni Verzellesi,
  • Dandan Zhu,
  • Colin Humphreys

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4882176
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 4, no. 6
pp. 067118 – 067118-23

Abstract

Read online

Electroluminescence (EL) characterization of InGaN/GaN light-emitting diodes (LEDs), coupled with numerical device models of different sophistication, is routinely adopted not only to establish correlations between device efficiency and structural features, but also to make inferences about the loss mechanisms responsible for LED efficiency droop at high driving currents. The limits of this investigative approach are discussed here in a case study based on a comprehensive set of current- and temperature-dependent EL data from blue LEDs with low and high densities of threading dislocations (TDs). First, the effects limiting the applicability of simpler (closed-form and/or one-dimensional) classes of models are addressed, like lateral current crowding, vertical carrier distribution nonuniformity, and interband transition broadening. Then, the major sources of uncertainty affecting state-of-the-art numerical device simulation are reviewed and discussed, including (i) the approximations in the transport description through the multi-quantum-well active region, (ii) the alternative valence band parametrizations proposed to calculate the spontaneous emission rate, (iii) the difficulties in defining the Auger coefficients due to inadequacies in the microscopic quantum well description and the possible presence of extra, non-Auger high-current-density recombination mechanisms and/or Auger-induced leakage. In the case of the present LED structures, the application of three-dimensional numerical-simulation-based analysis to the EL data leads to an explanation of efficiency droop in terms of TD-related and Auger-like nonradiative losses, with a C coefficient in the 10−30 cm6/s range at room temperature, close to the larger theoretical calculations reported so far. However, a study of the combined effects of structural and model uncertainties suggests that the C values thus determined could be overestimated by about an order of magnitude. This preliminary attempt at uncertainty quantification confirms, beyond the present case, the need for an improved description of carrier transport and microscopic radiative and nonradiative recombination mechanisms in device-level LED numerical models.