Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (Mar 2024)

Pulsed Field Ablation and Neurocardiology: Inert to Efferents or Delayed Destruction?

  • Derek Chang,
  • Andrew Arbogast,
  • Ikeotunye Royal Chinyere

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2503106
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 3
p. 106

Abstract

Read online

Background: The therapeutic use of irreversible electroporation in clinical cardiac laboratories, termed pulsed field ablation (PFA), is gaining pre-regulatory approval momentum among rhythm specialists for the mitigation of arrhythmogenic substrate without increased procedural risk. Though electroporation has been utilized in other branches of science and medicine for decades, apprehension regarding all the possible off-target complications of PFA have yet to be thoroughly identified and investigated. Methods: This brief review will summarize the preclinical and adult clinical data published to date on PFA’s effects on the autonomic system that interplays closely with the cardiovascular system, termed the neurocardiovascular system. These data are contrasted with the findings of efferent destruction secondary to thermal cardiac ablation modalities, namely radiofrequency energy and liquid nitrogen-based cryoablation. Results: In vitro neurocardiology findings, in vivo neurocardiology findings, and clinical neurocardiology findings to date nearly unanimously support the preservation of a critical mass of perineural structures and extracellular matrices to allow for long-term nervous regeneration in both cardiac and non-cardiac settings. Conclusions: Limited histopathologic data exist for neurocardiovascular outcomes post-PFA. Neuron damage is not only theoretically possible, but has been observed with irreversible electroporation, however regeneration is almost always concomitantly described.

Keywords