Impact of myelodysplasia‐related and additional gene mutations in intensively treated patients with NPM1‐mutated AML
Sibylle Cocciardi,
Maral Saadati,
Nina Weiß,
Daniela Späth,
Silke Kapp‐Schwoerer,
Isabelle Schneider,
Annika Meid,
Verena I. Gaidzik,
Sabrina Skambraks,
Walter Fiedler,
Michael W. M. Kühn,
Ulrich Germing,
Karin T. Mayer,
Michael Lübbert,
Elli Papaemmanuil,
Felicitas Thol,
Michael Heuser,
Arnold Ganser,
Lars Bullinger,
Axel Benner,
Hartmut Döhner,
Konstanze Döhner
Affiliations
Sibylle Cocciardi
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Maral Saadati
Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Nina Weiß
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Daniela Späth
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Silke Kapp‐Schwoerer
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Isabelle Schneider
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Annika Meid
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Verena I. Gaidzik
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Sabrina Skambraks
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Walter Fiedler
Department of Oncology, Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation with Section Pneumology University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Hospital Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Michael W. M. Kühn
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg‐University Mainz Germany
Ulrich Germing
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty Düsseldorf Germany
Karin T. Mayer
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Bonn Bonn Germany
Michael Lübbert
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg Germany
Elli Papaemmanuil
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York USA
Felicitas Thol
Department of Hematology Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Michael Heuser
Department of Hematology Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Arnold Ganser
Department of Hematology Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
Lars Bullinger
Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology Charité‐Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
Axel Benner
Division of Biostatistics German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Hartmut Döhner
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
Konstanze Döhner
Department of Internal Medicine III University Hospital of Ulm Ulm Germany
ABSTRACT This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the myelodysplasia‐related gene (MRG) as well as additional gene mutations on outcomes in intensively treated patients with NPM1‐mutated (NPM1mut) AML. Targeted DNA sequencing of 263 genes was performed in 568 NPM1mut AML patients (median age: 59 years) entered into the prospective AMLSG 09‐09 treatment trial. Most commonly co‐mutated genes were DNMT3A (49.8%), FLT3‐TKD (25.9%), PTPN11 (24.8%), NRAS (22.7%), TET2 (21.7%), IDH2 (21.3%), IDH1 (18%), and FLT3‐ITD (17.3%). MRG mutations were identified in 18.1% of cases (18–60 years: 9.8%; >60 years: 28.7%). When focusing on the 470 patients with 2022 ELN favorable‐risk NPM1mut AML, multivariable analysis for event‐free survival (EFS) identified age (p < 0.001), DNMT3AR882 (p < 0.001), IDH1 (p = 0.007), and MRG mutations (p = 0.03) as unfavorable factors, cohesin gene co‐mutations (p = 0.001) and treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (p = 0.007) as favorable factors. Restricting the analysis to a subset of CR/CRi patients with available data on NPM1mut measurable residual disease (MRD) status in blood post cycle 2 in the model, MRG mutations lost their significant effect, whereas DNMT3AR882, MYC, and cohesin gene mutations retained the adverse and favorable effects. For OS, age (p < 0.001), DNMT3AR882 (p = 0.042), IDH1 (p = 0.045), and KRAS (0.003) mutations were unfavorable factors, sole favorable factor was IDH2 co‐mutation (p = 0.037). In 2022 ELN favorable‐risk NPM1mut AML, MRG mutations are associated with inferior EFS; however, this effect is no longer present when considering NPM1mut MRD status post cycle 2; DNMT3AR882 and MYC mutations remained adverse, and cohesin gene mutations favorable prognostic factors independent of the NPM1mut MRD status.