Cancers (Sep 2023)

Comparing Robotic-Assisted to Open Radical Cystectomy in the Management of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Propensity Score Matched-Pair Analysis

  • Etienne Courboin,
  • Romain Mathieu,
  • Valentina Panetta,
  • Georges Mjaess,
  • Romain Diamand,
  • Gregory Verhoest,
  • Mathieu Roumiguié,
  • Anne Sophie Bajeot,
  • Francesco Soria,
  • Chiara Lonati,
  • Claudio Simeone,
  • Giuseppe Simone,
  • Umberto Anceschi,
  • Paolo Umari,
  • Ashwin Sridhar,
  • John Kelly,
  • Laura S. Mertens,
  • Rafael Sanchez-Salas,
  • Anna Colomer,
  • Maria Angela Cerruto,
  • Alessandro Antonelli,
  • Wojciech Krajewski,
  • Thierry Quackels,
  • Alexandre Peltier,
  • Francesco Montorsi,
  • Alberto Briganti,
  • Jeremy Y. C. Teoh,
  • Benjamin Pradere,
  • Marco Moschini,
  • Thierry Roumeguère,
  • Simone Albisinni

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194732
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 19
p. 4732

Abstract

Read online

Background: For non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) requiring radical surgery, limited data are available comparing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC). The objective of this study was to compare the two surgical techniques. Methods: A multicentric cohort of 593 patients with NMIBC undergoing iRARC or ORC between 2015 and 2020 was prospectively gathered. Perioperative and pathologic outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 143 patients operated on via iRARC were matched to 143 ORC patients. Operative time was longer in the iRARC group (p = 0.034). Blood loss was higher in the ORC group (p p = 0.003). Length of stay was longer in the ORC group (p = 0.007). Post-operative complications did not differ significantly (all p > 0.05). DFS at 60 months was 55.9% in ORC and 75.2% in iRARC with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.033) found in the univariate analysis. Conclusion: We found that iRARC for patients with NMIBC is safe, associated with a lower blood loss, a lower transfusion rate and a shorter hospital stay compared to ORC. Complication rates were similar. No significant differences in survival analyses emerged across the two techniques.

Keywords