Drug and Alcohol Dependence Reports (Jun 2024)

Policies, adaptations, and ongoing challenges to naloxone, buprenorphine and nonprescription syringe access across four-states: Findings from an environmental scan and key informant interviews

  • Anthony S. Floyd,
  • Joseph Silcox,
  • Gail Strickler,
  • Thuong Nong,
  • Malcolm Blough,
  • Derek Bolivar,
  • Megan Rabin,
  • Jeffrey Bratberg,
  • Adriane N. Irwin,
  • Daniel M. Hartung,
  • Ryan N. Hansen,
  • Robert Bohler,
  • Traci C. Green

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11
p. 100243

Abstract

Read online

Background: As the US opioid-involved morbidity and mortality increase, uptake and implementation of evidence-based interventions remain key policy responses. Respond to Prevent was a multi-component, randomized trial implemented in four states and two large pharmacy chains with the aim of improving the pharmacy’s capacity to provide naloxone, dispense buprenorphine, and sell nonprescription syringes (NPS). We sought to provide context and assess how policies and organizational practices affect communities and pharmacies across the study states. Methods: Using a multi-method approach we: 1) conducted an environmental scan of published literature and online materials spanning January 2015 to June 2021, 2) created timelines of key events pertaining to those policies and practices and 3) conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (key informants) at the state and local levels (N=36) to provide further context for the policies and practices we discovered. Results: Key informants discussed state policies, pharmacy policies and local practices that facilitated access to naloxone, buprenorphine and NPSs. Interviewees from all states spoke about the impact of naloxone standing orders, active partnerships with community-based harm reduction organizations, and some federal and state policies like Medicaid coverage for naloxone and buprenorphine, and buprenorphine telehealth permissions as key facilitators. They also discussed patient stigma, access in rural settings, and high cost of medications as barriers. Conclusion: Findings underscore the important role harm reduction-related policies play in boosting and institutionalizing interventions in communities and pharmacies while also identifying structural barriers where more focused state and local attention is needed.

Keywords