Eating and Weight Disorders (Dec 2023)

Risk of binge eating disorder in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

  • Lucia Brodosi,
  • Michele Stecchi,
  • Francesca Marchignoli,
  • Elisabetta Lucia,
  • Lucia Magnani,
  • Valeria Guarneri,
  • Maria Letizia Petroni,
  • Giulio Marchesini,
  • Loris Pironi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-023-01628-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 28, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose Very few data exist on the association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and eating disorders. The study aimed to evaluate the presence of binge eating disorder (BED), in MASLD subjects. Methods Demographic, clinical investigation, anthropometric measurements and laboratory were collected in 129 patients with MASLD (34.1% males; age, 53.7 years; BMI, 34.4 kg/m2) addressed by general practitioners to a hospital-based unit of metabolic disorders. The risk of binge eating was tested by the binge eating scale (BES); values in the range 17–26 were considered “possible” BED, values > 26 were considered “probable” BED. Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis were tested by surrogate biomarkers and imaging (transient elastography). Calorie intake and lifestyle were self-assessed by questionnaires. Results Possible BED was present in 17.8% of cases, probable BED in another 7.6%, and were neither associated with gender, obesity class, diabetes, features of metabolic syndrome, nor with presence and severity of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Also steatosis grade by CAP and fibrosis stage by liver stiffness did not correlate with BES. However, an association was present between the daily caloric intake and “possible” BED (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–1.24; “probable” BED, 1.21; 1.07–1.37), after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion Binge eating, as scored by BES, is present in a significant proportion of MASLD cases screened for metabolic disorders in a specialized center. It may impact behavioral treatment, reducing the chance of weight loss without systematic psychological support. Level of Evidence: Level III, cohort analytic study

Keywords