Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Assessment (ICALA) in philosophy-based language instruction: unraveling the effects on critical thinking, self-evaluation, academic resilience, and speaking development

Abstract

Abstract Few empirical research has attempted to determine the impact of Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Assessment (ICALA) in philosophy-based language instruction (PBLI) on critical thinking, self-evaluation, and academic resilience, despite the significant role that higher-order thinking skills play in influencing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ cognition, including their learning processes. This research addresses this knowledge vacuum by examining how ICALA in PBLI influences the development of the four primary abilities associated with critical thinking, self-evaluation, and academic resilience. A quasi-experimental strategy was used in this study among 81 EFL learners. The participants were split into two groups: one to participate in the experiment and another to serve as a control. The books for both groups were revised or supplemented according to the underlying PBLI principles. The control group (CG) students were exposed to paper format assessment. In comparison, the experimental group (EG) attended ICALA. The statistical significance of the differences between the two groups was determined using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results demonstrated that the learners in EG outperformed their peers in CG foreign language-speaking development. Moreover, they received better critical thinking, self-evaluation, and academic resilience results.

Keywords

• Intelligent Computer-Assisted Language Assessment
• Philosophy-based language instruction
• Critical thinking
• Self-evaluation
• Academic resilience
• Speaking development