The Hierarchical Relationship Between the Relational-Self and the Collective-Self During Attention Processing

Abstract

Yingcan Zheng,1 Zilun Xiao,2 Xin Zhou,2 Zhuoya Yang3 1Developmental Psychology for Armyman, Department of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China; 3Basic Psychology, Department of Medical Psychology, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Yingcan Zheng, Army Medical University, Shapingba, Chongqing, 400038, People’s Republic of China, Tel [phone], Fax [phone], Email [email protected] Zilun Xiao, Southwest University, Beibei, Chongqing, 400715, People’s Republic of China, Tel [phone], Email [email protected]: Under the Chinese collectivist cultural system, people emphasize social connections with close others and members of in-groups. Collectivism can be divided into the following two forms: relational collectivism (privileges relational self [RS]) and group collectivism (emphasizes collective self [CS]). Previous researchers have found a hierarchy between the RS and CS, resulting in different degrees of recognition advantages. However, the hierarchy between the RS and CS is unclear and may depend on the specific processing stage. Therefore, this research compared the hierarchy between these two selves during different processing stages using an eye-movement method.Methods: The sample consisted of thirty-eight young adults aged between 18 and 24 years old (M = 20.45, SD= 1.62). Each participant finished a dot-probe task featuring high-relevant (HR, ie one’s mother’s name and China) and low-relevant (LR, ie, name of a famous person and USA) information about the RS and CS and neutral information. Further, the eye-movement (EM) indices were collected simultaneously.Results: A stronger reaction time bias and longer total gaze duration revealed that young people in China focus more on RS information, indicating that Chinese people prioritize the RS over the CS at late stages of attentional processing.Conclusion: Information on interpersonal relationships and information on the in-group both catch people’s attention quickly and easily, but only RS information can maintain attention for longer. Understanding the hierarchy of the RS and the CS may provide more evidence for self-construal in the Chinese collectivist cultural context. The importance of the RS prompting that the interpersonal and close relationships are more important to the development of the self, suggesting that it is necessary to pay more attention to the impact of interpersonal support on people’s mental health in clinical applications.Keywords: relational self, collective self, attentional bias, hierarchical relationship, self-prioritization

Keywords

• relational self
• collective self
• attentional bias
• hierarchical relationship
• self-prioritization