Biomethane Production from the Two-Stage Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Manure: Residual Edible Oil with Two Qualities of Waste-Activated Sludge
Jesus Eduardo de la Cruz-Azuara,
Alejandro Ruiz-Marin,
Yunuen Canedo-Lopez,
Claudia Alejandra Aguilar-Ucan,
Rosa Maria Ceron-Breton,
Julia Griselda Ceron-Breton,
Francisco Anguebes-Franseschi
Affiliations
Jesus Eduardo de la Cruz-Azuara
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Alejandro Ruiz-Marin
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Yunuen Canedo-Lopez
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Claudia Alejandra Aguilar-Ucan
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Rosa Maria Ceron-Breton
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Julia Griselda Ceron-Breton
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Francisco Anguebes-Franseschi
Facultad de Quimica, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Calle 56 No. 4. Av. Concordia, Col. Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen C.P. 24180, Campeche, Mexico
Wastewater treatment systems produce large volumes of sludge which is not used; its final disposal is in soil or landfill. This sludge represents a biomethane-energy alternative through anaerobic co-digestion, contributing to reducing the environmental impacts caused by their inadequate disposal. Biomethane production by the two-stage production method in batch digesters with pH and temperature control was evaluated by two qualities of waste-activated sludge (SLB50 and SLB90) and with a mixture of two co-substrates: cow manure (CEV50 and CEV90) and residual edible oil (CAV50 and CAV90). Bacteria in good-quality sludge (SLB90) showed a faster adaptation of 2 days than those in low-quality sludge (SLB50), with a 25-day lag phase. The highest CH4 production was for SLB90 (303.99 cm3 d−1) compared to SLB50 (4.33 cm3 d−1). However, the cow manure–sludge mixture (CEV90) contributed to the increased production of CH4 (42,422.8 cm3 d−1) compared to CEV50 (12,881.45 cm3 CH4 d−1); for CAV90 and CAV50, these were 767.32 cm3 d−1 and 211.42 cm3 d−1, respectively. The addition of sludge co-substrates improves the nutrient balance and C/N ratio; consequently, methane production improves. This methodology could be integrated into concepts of the circular economy.