PLoS ONE (Jan 2022)

Methodology to estimate natural- and vaccine-induced antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in a large geographic region

  • Stacia M. DeSantis,
  • Luis G. León-Novelo,
  • Michael D. Swartz,
  • Ashraf S. Yaseen,
  • Melissa A. Valerio-Shewmaker,
  • Yashar Talebi,
  • Frances A. Brito,
  • Jessica A. Ross,
  • Harold W. Kohl,
  • Sarah E. Messiah,
  • Steve H. Kelder,
  • Leqing Wu,
  • Shiming Zhang,
  • Kimberly A. Aguillard,
  • Michael O. Gonzalez,
  • Onyinye S. Omega-Njemnob,
  • David Lakey,
  • Jennifer A. Shuford,
  • Stephen Pont,
  • Eric Boerwinkle

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 9

Abstract

Read online

Accurate estimates of natural and/or vaccine-induced antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 are difficult to obtain. Although model-based estimates of seroprevalence have been proposed, they require inputting unknown parameters including viral reproduction number, longevity of immune response, and other dynamic factors. In contrast to a model-based approach, the current study presents a data-driven detailed statistical procedure for estimating total seroprevalence (defined as antibodies from natural infection or from full vaccination) in a region using prospectively collected serological data and state-level vaccination data. Specifically, we conducted a longitudinal statewide serological survey with 88,605 participants 5 years or older with 3 prospective blood draws beginning September 30, 2020. Along with state vaccination data, as of October 31, 2021, the estimated percentage of those 5 years or older with naturally occurring antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Texas is 35.0% (95% CI = (33.1%, 36.9%)). This is 3× higher than, state-confirmed COVID-19 cases (11.83%) for all ages. The percentage with naturally occurring or vaccine-induced antibodies (total seroprevalence) is 77.42%. This methodology is integral to pandemic preparedness as accurate estimates of seroprevalence can inform policy-making decisions relevant to SARS-CoV-2.