Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Sep 2024)

The effect of brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation training on rehabilitation of upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Chunlin Ren,
  • Xinmin Li,
  • Qian Gao,
  • Qian Gao,
  • Mengyang Pan,
  • Jing Wang,
  • Fangjie Yang,
  • Zhenfei Duan,
  • Pengxue Guo,
  • Yasu Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1438095
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18

Abstract

Read online

IntroductionSeveral clinical studies have demonstrated that brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) controlled functional electrical stimulation (FES) facilitate neurological recovery in patients with stroke. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of BCI-FES training on upper limb functional recovery in stroke patients.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science Direct and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) employing BCI-FES training were included. The methodological quality of the RCTs was assessed using the PEDro scale. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 and STATA 18.ResultsThe meta-analysis comprised 290 patients from 10 RCTs. Results showed a moderate effect size in upper limb function recovery through BCI-FES training (SMD = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26–0.73, I2 = 0%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis revealed that BCI-FES training significantly enhanced upper limb motor function in BCI-FES vs. FES group (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.00–0.74, I2 = 21%, p = 0.05), and the BCI-FES + CR vs. CR group (SMD = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.28–0.95, I2 = 0%, p = 0.0003). Moreover, BCI-FES training demonstrated effectiveness in both subacute (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.25–0.87, I2 = 0%, p = 0.0004) and chronic groups (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.05–0.78, I2 = 45%, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that both adjusting (SMD = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.24–0.87, I2 = 0%, p = 0.0006) and fixing (SMD = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.07–0.78, I2 = 46%, p = 0.02). BCI thresholds before training significantly improved motor function in stroke patients. Both motor imagery (MI) (SMD = 0.41 95% CI: 0.12–0.71, I2 = 13%, p = 0.006) and action observation (AO) (SMD = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.26–1.20, I2 = 0%, p = 0.002) as mental tasks significantly improved upper limb function in stroke patients.DiscussionBCI-FES has significant immediate effects on upper limb function in subacute and chronic stroke patients, but evidence for its long-term impact remains limited. Using AO as the mental task may be a more effective BCI-FES training strategy.Systematic review registrationIdentifier: CRD42023485744, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023485744.

Keywords