Diagnostic Utility of the “Lancet Consensus Scoring System” in Suspected Cases of Tuberculous Meningitis in Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Central India

Abstract

Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a challenging condition to diagnose, and current laboratory methods have limitations, especially in developing countries. This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of the Lancet consensus scoring (LCS) system in suspected TBM cases at a tertiary care center in India. Methods: The clinical manifestations of 75 patients with suspected TBM were prospectively evaluated using the LCS system, which categorizes cases as “definite” (laboratory confirmed), “probable” (>10 points without imaging or > 12 points with imaging), and “possible” (6–9 points without imaging or 6–11 points with imaging). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the LCS system were compared to GeneXpert and mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) liquid culture, which are considered the gold standard tests. Results: Out of 75 recruited cases, 11 were confirmed as definite TBM cases. The LCS system correctly identified 8 of these as “probable” and 3 as “possible” cases. Compared to GeneXpert, the LCS system had a specificity of 100%, sensitivity of 54.55%, NPV of 92.7%, and PPV of 100%. Compared to MGIT liquid culture, the LCS system had a specificity of 100%, sensitivity of 81.82%, NPV of 96.97%, and PPV of 100%. The diagnostic accuracy was higher for MGIT liquid culture (97.33%) than GeneXpert (93.33%). Conclusion: The LCS system is a practical and easily applicable tool that can aid the diagnosis of suspected TBM cases, particularly in resource-limited settings. Despite some limitations, the LCS system demonstrated good diagnostic performance, suggesting its potential utility in improving TBM diagnosis and management.

Keywords

• central nervous system infections
• diagnosis
• lcs system
• tuberculosis
• tuberculous meningitis