EClinicalMedicine (May 2023)

Onasemnogene abeparvovec in spinal muscular atrophy: predictors of efficacy and safety in naïve patients with spinal muscular atrophy and following switch from other therapiesResearch in context

  • Marika Pane,
  • Beatrice Berti,
  • Anna Capasso,
  • Giorgia Coratti,
  • Antonio Varone,
  • Adele D’Amico,
  • Sonia Messina,
  • Riccardo Masson,
  • Valeria Ada Sansone,
  • Maria Alice Donati,
  • Caterina Agosto,
  • Claudio Bruno,
  • Federica Ricci,
  • Antonella Pini,
  • Delio Gagliardi,
  • Massimiliano Filosto,
  • Stefania Corti,
  • Daniela Leone,
  • Concetta Palermo,
  • Roberta Onesimo,
  • Roberto De Sanctis,
  • Martina Ricci,
  • Ilaria Bitetti,
  • Maria Sframeli,
  • Claudia Dosi,
  • Emilio Albamonte,
  • Chiara Ticci,
  • Noemi Brolatti,
  • Enrico Bertini,
  • Richard Finkel,
  • Eugenio Mercuri,
  • Maria Carmela Pera,
  • Chiara Bravetti,
  • Marco Piastra,
  • Orazio Genovese,
  • Gianpaolo Cicala,
  • Nicola Forcina,
  • Sara Carnicella,
  • Giulia Stanca,
  • Michele Sacchini,
  • Michela Catteruccia,
  • Michele Tosi,
  • Renato Cutrera,
  • Claudio Chierchi,
  • Maria Beatrice Chiarini,
  • Francesca Salmin,
  • Marina Pedemonte,
  • Alessandra Govoni,
  • Irene Mizzoni,
  • Simone Morando,
  • Riccardo Zanin,
  • Enrica Rolle,
  • Eleonora Salomon,
  • Melania Giannotta,
  • Gaia Scarpini,
  • Antonio Toscano,
  • Eloisa Gitto,
  • Roberto Materia,
  • Rossella D’Alessandro

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 59
p. 101997

Abstract

Read online

Summary: Background: Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) for Spinal Muscular Atrophy infants under 7 months and <8.5 kg has been reported in clinical trials. This study examines efficacy and safety predictors in a wide age (22 days–72 months) and weight (3.2–17 kg) range, also including patients previously treated with other drugs. Methods: 46 patients were treated for 12 months between January 2020 and March 2022. Safety profile was also available for another 21 patients with at least 6 month follow-up after OA infusion. 19/67 were treatment naïve when treated with OA. Motor function was measured with the CHOP-INTEND. Findings: CHOP-INTEND changes varied among age groups. Baseline score and age at OA treatment best predicted changes. A mixed model post-hoc analysis showed that in patients treated before the age of 24 months the CHOP-INTEND changes were already significant 3 months after OA while in those treated after the age of 24 months the difference was only significant 12 months after OA. Adverse events occurred in 51/67. The risk for elevated transaminases serum levels was higher in older patients. This was also true for weight and for pre-treatment with nusinersen when analysed individually. A binomial negative regression analysis showed that only age at OA treatment had a significant effect on the risk of elevated transaminases. Interpretation: Our paper describes OA 12-month follow-up showing efficacy across various age and weight groups not targeted by clinical trials. The study identifies prognostic factors for safety and efficacy in treatment selection. Funding: None.

Keywords