Targeting Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) Related Refractory Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNST) in a Phase II Study of Everolimus in Combination with Bevacizumab (SARC016)
Brigitte C. Widemann,
Yao Lu,
Denise Reinke,
Scott H. Okuno,
Christian F. Meyer,
Gregory M. Cote,
Rashmi Chugh,
Mohammed M. Milhem,
Angela C. Hirbe,
AeRang Kim,
Brian Turpin,
Joseph G. Pressey,
Eva Dombi,
Nalini Jayaprakash,
Lee J. Helman,
Ndidi Onwudiwe,
Karen Cichowski,
John P. Perentesis
Affiliations
Brigitte C. Widemann
National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, Pediatric Oncology Branch, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 1-3752, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Yao Lu
SARC Statistics, Weill Cornell Medicine Healthcare and Policy Research, 402 East 67th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
Denise Reinke
SARC, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
Scott H. Okuno
Mayo Clinic, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Purpose. There are no known effective medical treatments for refractory MPNST. Inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor in MPNST results in upregulation of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signaling and angiogenesis, which contributes to disease progression. We conducted a phase II study for patients (pts) with refractory MPNST combining everolimus (10 mg PO once daily) with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) to determine the clinical benefit rate (CBR) (complete response, partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months). Patients and Methods. Patients ≥18 years old with chemotherapy refractory sporadic or NF1 MPNST were eligible. Tumor response was assessed after every 2 cycles (the WHO criteria). A two-stage design targeting a 25% CBR was used: if ≥ 1/15 pts in stage 1 responded, enrollment would be expanded by 10 pts, and if ≥ 4/25 patients had clinical benefit, the combination would be considered active. Results. Twenty-five pts, 17 with NF1 and 8 with sporadic MPNST, enrolled. One of 15 pts in stage 1 had clinical benefit. Of 10 additional pts enrolled, 2 had clinical benefit. The median number of completed cycles was 3 (range 1–16). Adverse events were similar to those known for this combination. Conclusion. With a CBR of 12% (3/25), the combination of everolimus and bevacizumab did not reach the study’s target response rate and is not considered active in refractory MPNST.