Horticulturae (May 2024)

Post-Frost Pruning Does Not Impact Vine Yield and Berry Composition in Young Grapevines

  • Suraj Kar,
  • Ricky W. Clark,
  • Ian T. Ivey,
  • Joseph B. DeShields,
  • Jeremy Cusimano,
  • Alexander D. Levin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10050505
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 5
p. 505

Abstract

Read online

Spring frost is a perennial and widespread problem across many cool climatic and high-elevation winegrowing regions of the world. Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot noir is an early budding cultivar; thus, it is particularly susceptible to late-spring frost damage. In late April 2022, an advective frost event occurred throughout Western Oregon winegrowing regions and subsequently damaged a substantial number of commercial vineyards. Growers often are unsure of how to manage grapevines after a frost event. Limited research has shown little-to-no effect of pruning vs. non-pruning strategies on vine yield and productivity. In addition, pruning a frost-affected vineyard incurs additional labor costs that may offset the cost–benefit balance for the grower. Therefore, in this experiment, the effect of two different post-frost pruning treatments (cane pruning and spur pruning) on vine yield, berry composition, and vine vegetative growth were tested. No effect of post-frost pruning treatments on vine yield, berry composition, and vine vegetative characteristics was observed. Cluster numbers, cluster weights, and berries per cluster only differed between cane- vs. spur-pruned vines. Therefore, leaving frost-affected vines alone and a scaled-back vineyard management practice could be practical for economic reasons.

Keywords