IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (Jan 2024)

A Novel Forest Dynamic Growth Visualization Method by Incorporating Spatial Structural Parameters Based on Convolutional Neural Network

  • Linlong Wang,
  • Huaiqing Zhang,
  • Kexin Lei,
  • Tingdong Yang,
  • Jing Zhang,
  • Zeyu Cui,
  • Rurao Fu,
  • Hongyan Yu,
  • Baowei Zhao,
  • Xianyin Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3342445
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17
pp. 3471 – 3488

Abstract

Read online

Current visual methods of forest dynamic growth mostly focus on the plot or stand level, which cannot express the morphological and structural characteristics of individual trees, as well as their statistical linkages, and causes each tree in the stand to grow at the same rate. In addition, these visual growth models still have some space for improvement in terms of prediction accuracy and multirelational data mining. In this article, uneven-aged Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) plantations were chosen as our study subject and proposed a novel method of forest dynamic growth visualization modeling by incorporating spatial structure parameters and using convolutional neural network technique (FDGVM-CNN-SSP) to explore the effect of spatial structure on the morphological growth and to develop a prediction growth model of Chinese fir plantations by introducing a convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The results show that: first, spatial structural parameters C and U have a certain contribution to the forest growth, and C and U can explain 21.5%, 15.2%, and 9.3% of the variance in DBH, H, and CW growth models, respectively; second, CNN model outperformed machine learning algorithms SVR, MARS, Cubist, RF, and XGBoost in terms of prediction performance; third, based on FDGVM-CNN-SSP, we simulated Chinese fir plantations at individual tree level and stand level from 2018 to 2022 and found that DBH and H's fitting performance in measured and predicted data was highly consistent with R2 and root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 86.8%, 2.06 cm in DBH and 79.2%, 1.11 m in H, but CW's R2 and RMSE of 72.2%, 0.65 m caused crowding (C) inconsistency.

Keywords