Indian Heart Journal (Mar 2017)

Barriers to Early Discharge after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (BED PCI): A Single-Center Study

  • Francis D. Graziano,
  • Sandeep Banga,
  • Denise K. Busman,
  • Purushothaman Muthusamy,
  • David H. Wohns

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.323
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 69, no. 2
pp. 217 – 222

Abstract

Read online

Objective: To identify patient characteristics and procedural factors that may play a role in hindering same-day discharge (SDD) practices. Background: Multiple studies have shown the safety and cost effectiveness of SDD following elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but factors that hinder SDD practices have not been thoroughly studied. Material and Methods: A retrospective comparative analysis of elective PCI patients who had an overnight stay (OS) (n = 345) vs. SDD patients (n = 222) was conducted to identify significant differences between the two groups in baseline patient characteristics, procedural, and postprocedural factors. Results: Comparing OS to SDD patients, OS patients had a lower prevalence of radial access (20.29% vs. 39.64%, P < 0.0001); a higher incidence of suboptimal angiographic results (14.49% vs. 1.80%, P = 0.0027); CRCL values lower than 60 mL/min (26.38% vs. 15.32%, P = 0.0019); and greater femoral vascular site hemostasis with manual compression (69.09% vs. 36.57%, P = 0.0027). OS patients received larger sheath sizes (P = 0.0209), more bivalirudin (45.80% vs. 36.70%) and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (5.51% vs. 2.25%), but less heparin (51.30% vs. 53.21%). Chest pain (8.12% vs. 0.92%, P = 0.0042) and vascular access site concerns (20.58% vs. 0%, P = 0.0027) were more common among OS patients. Conclusions: Pre-, peri-, and post-procedural factors play a role in SDD eligibility. Understanding factors that limit as well as those that facilitate SDD may enable institutions to establish or enhance a SDD program.

Keywords