Local Pedicled Flaps and Biological Implant Options for Patients Undergoing Proctectomy for Crohn’s Disease When an Omental Pedicle Flap Is Not Possible

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Perineal wound complications and pelvic fluid collections or abscesses following proctectomy for Crohn’s disease are a common cause of morbidity and might be mitigated by filling the pelvis and occluding the pelvic inlet with a flap. Alternative flap options can be considered when inadequate omentum is available and when avoiding myofasciocutaneous flaps. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of our Crohn’s proctectomy database was conducted to identify patients who underwent a non-omental or non-myofasciocutaneous local pedicle flap to their pelvis or pelvic exclusion using biological material during surgery. The techniques and outcomes of these alternative techniques are described in detail. Results: 228 patients underwent proctectomy for Crohn’s disease during the 10-year study period. However, only six patients had their pelvis filled or pelvic inlet occluded using a non-omental, non-myofasciocutaneous local pedicled flap or biological material. The techniques identified included two sigmoid mesocolic flaps, one peritoneal, preperitoneal fat and falciform ligament flap, one perivesical fat flap, one Gerota’s fat pad flap, and one bovine pericardial patch assisted pelvic exclusion. These flaps’ clinicopathological and operative characteristics, surgical outcomes, and technical aspects are described. Conclusions: When greater omentum is unavailable or inadequate and myofasciocutaneous flaps need to be avoided, local pedicled flaps using a range of intra-abdominal tissues or biological material can be used to fill the pelvis or occlude the pelvic inlet after proctectomy for Crohn’s disease. These techniques may help to prevent short and long-term complications associated with having a pelvic dead space.

Keywords

• Crohn’s disease
• proctectomy
• perineal wound
• pedicled flaps