Antibiotics (Sep 2022)

Efficacy of <i>Lactobacillus animalis</i> and <i>Propionibacterium freudenreichii</i>-Based Feed Additives in Reducing <i>Salmonella</i>-Associated Health and Performance Effects in Commercial Beef Calves

  • Charley Cull,
  • Vijay K. Singu,
  • Brooke J. Cull,
  • Kelly F. Lechtenberg,
  • Raghavendra G. Amachawadi,
  • Jennifer S. Schutz,
  • Keith A. Bryan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101328
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 10
p. 1328

Abstract

Read online

Salmonella enterica, which causes typhoid fever, is one of the most prevalent food-borne pathogens. Salmonellosis in cattle can greatly impact a producer’s income due to treatment costs, decreased productivity of the herd, and mortality due to disease. Current methods of treatment and prevention for salmonellosis consist of antibiotics and vaccinations, but neither of these options are perfect. Probiotics, categorized as antibiotic alternatives, are living microorganisms that are added to animal feeds in appropriate quantities in order to benefit health and productivity in adult and newborn livestock. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that Lactobacillus animalis and Propionibacterium freudenreichii, when used as a direct-fed microbial, was effective in reducing the adverse effects of experimentally induced Salmonella infection in beef calves. We conducted a single site efficacy study with masking using a randomized design comprising two groups of ten beef calves allocated to two treatment groups (control and probiotic). Procedures such as determining general health scores and body weight and collecting fecal samples were carried out following the experimental challenge of calves with Salmonella Typhimurium. The presence of at least one CFU of bacteria in feces was significantly higher among animals in the control than in the probiotic group, which was higher on days 0 to 7 than on days 8 to 14 (p = 0.012). Animals in the control group had a significantly higher presence of abnormal diarrhea scores than animals in the probiotic group (p < 0.001). Most notably, other health benefits in probiotic-fed group calves were obviously better than those for control calves and further substantiates the potential economic and health benefits of feeding effective probiotics.

Keywords