Constitutional elements of the Global Network

Abstract

The main thesis sustained in the paper is that judicial dialogue is a new concept/category that may solve some problems arising in situations of constitutional pluralism. But not every quotation of a foreign jurisdiction can be considered a form of dialogue. Judicial dialogues have their own objectives, structure and solution diverse from the mere comparative dialogues among courts.Published online: 27 November 2014

Keywords

• diálogos judiciales
• pluralismo constitucional
• superposiciones en la protección de derechos