PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

Comparing different types of statins for secondary prevention of cardio-cerebrovascular disease from a national cohort study.

  • Joungyoun Kim,
  • Hyeong-Seop Kim,
  • Yun-Jong Bae,
  • Hyeong-Chul Lee,
  • Jae-Woo Lee,
  • Hee-Taik Kang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247419
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 2
p. e0247419

Abstract

Read online

Statins have been recommended for use in atherosclerotic cardio-cerebrovascular disease (CCVD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of five different types of statin in the secondary prevention of CCVD in patients. This study retrospectively designed and analyzed data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Health in Korea. Participants aged 40 to 69 years were categorized into five statin groups (atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin). The primary composite outcome was defined as recurrence of CCVD or all causes of death. Cox proportional hazard regression models were adopted after stepwise adjustments for confounders to investigate the difference in efficacy among the different statins. Of the 755 final participants, 48 patients experienced primary composite outcomes. After adjustments, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for primary composite outcomes of atorvastatin, pitavastatin, and rosuvastatin groups were 0.956 (0.456-2.005), 1.347 (0.354-5.116), and 0.943 (0.317-2.803), respectively, when compared with the simvastatin group. There were no significant differences between the statins in efficacy for preventing recurrence of CCVD events and/or death in CCVD patients.