Biomedicines (Dec 2022)

Detection of <i>BRCA1</i>, and <i>BRCA2</i> Alterations in Matched Tumor Tissue and Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Patients with Prostate Cancer in a Real-World Setting

  • Taylor Ryan McFarland,
  • Vinay Mathew Thomas,
  • Roberto Nussenzveig,
  • Georges Gebrael,
  • Nicolas Sayegh,
  • Nishita Tripathi,
  • Kamal Kant Sahu,
  • Divyam Goel,
  • Benjamin L. Maughan,
  • Deepika Sirohi,
  • Neeraj Agarwal,
  • Umang Swami

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10123170
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 12
p. 3170

Abstract

Read online

Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA1 and/or 2 mutations. Identifying patients with prostate cancer harboring these mutations may be challenging. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provides an avenue for an easier detection of these mutations. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the concordance of BRCA mutations in the tumor tissue and cfDNA in patients with metastatic prostate cancer in the real-world setting. Methods: Somatic genomic profiling results were obtained from a clinical cohort of patients at our institution who had at least two samples tested. One of the samples needed to be from either primary or metastatic tissue. Concordance was adjusted to not include mutation types that the cfDNA platforms were not designed to detect. Results: The presence or absence of mutations in the BRCA gene was assessed in a total of 589 samples, including 327 cfDNA samples, from 260 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The median time between the first test and any subsequent test was 22.8 (0.0–232) months. BRCA mutation was present in the patient’s original prostate tissue in 23 samples (3.9%) of patients. The adjusted concordance between prostate tumor tissue and cfDNA was 97.9% [95% CI, 95.3–99.1%]. The adjusted concordance between metastatic samples and cfDNA was 93.5% [95% CI, 86.4–97.3%]. Of the patients who had a BRCA mutation detected in their prostate tissue, there was a 70% probability of detecting a BRCA mutation in the patient’s cfDNA as well. For patients who did not have a detectable BRCA mutation in their primary prostate tissue, the probability of detecting a subsequent one later in the disease course was less than 0.9%. Conclusion: There is a high level of concordance between tissue and blood for BRCA mutations. Testing cfDNA can provide reliable information on BRCA mutational status and is a viable alternative to solid tissue sequencing when unavailable. The development of a new BRCA mutation later in the disease course is a rare event.

Keywords