BMJ Open (Jan 2025)
How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries
- ,
- Partha Basu,
- Martin McKee,
- Adriana Băban,
- Marc Bardou,
- Ana Fernandes,
- Margarida Teixeira,
- Rebecca Moore,
- Nuno Lunet,
- David Ritchie,
- Romeu Mendes,
- Eric Lucas,
- Paolo Giorgi Rossi,
- Rosa Legood,
- Berit Andersen,
- Diana Taut,
- Keitly Mensah,
- João Firmino-Machado,
- Mariana Amorim,
- Mette Tranberg,
- Laura Bonvicini,
- Anneli Uusküla,
- Pia Kirkegaard,
- Paola Mantellini,
- Ines Baia,
- Liu Sun,
- Lise Rochaix,
- Camilla Fiorina,
- Luca Ghirotto,
- Anna Tisler,
- Firmino Machado,
- Rikke Buus Bøje,
- Raquel Rico Berrocal,
- Noemi Auzzi,
- Kerli Reintamm,
- Yulia Panayotova,
- Tatyana Kotzeva,
- Anna Foss,
- Rachel Greenley,
- Letizia Bartolini,
- Giusy Iorio,
- Cláudia Gouvinhas,
- Florian Nicula,
- Alexandra Tolnai,
- Vanessa Moore,
- Isabel Mosquera Metcalfe,
- Violette Delisle,
- Irina Todorova,
- Helena Ros Comesana,
- Meritxel Mallafré-Larrosa,
- Ginevra Papi,
- Nicoleta-Monica Pașca,
- Christiane Dascher-Nadel,
- Olivra Djuric
Affiliations
- pharmacologist
- Partha Basu
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Martin McKee
- professor of European public health
- Adriana Băban
- Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Marc Bardou
- 1 Centre d’investigation clinique – module plurithématique (CIC-P) INSERM 1432, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- Ana Fernandes
- Margarida Teixeira
- EPI Unit–Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Rebecca Moore
- 2 General Paediatrics, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK
- Nuno Lunet
- 1 EPIunit and Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Universidade do Porto Instituto de Saude Publica, Porto, Portugal
- David Ritchie
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Romeu Mendes
- 2 World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Eric Lucas
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Rosa Legood
- 2London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Berit Andersen
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Diana Taut
- Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Keitly Mensah
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, IARC, Lyon, France
- João Firmino-Machado
- EPI Unit–Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Mariana Amorim
- EPI Unit–Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Mette Tranberg
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening and Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Laura Bonvicini
- Epidemiology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Anneli Uusküla
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Pia Kirkegaard
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Paola Mantellini
- Division of Screening, Institute for Study, Prevention and Network in Oncology (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
- Ines Baia
- EPI Unit–Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Liu Sun
- Air Sectors Assessment and Exposure Science Division, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Lise Rochaix
- Camilla Fiorina
- Luca Ghirotto
- Laboratorio EduCare, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Anna Tisler
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Firmino Machado
- Rikke Buus Bøje
- University Research Clinic for Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Raquel Rico Berrocal
- Centre d’Etudes des Mouvements Sociaux, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France
- Noemi Auzzi
- Istituto per lo Studio, la Prevenzione e la Rete Oncologica, Osservatorio Nazionale Screening, Florence, Italy
- Kerli Reintamm
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Yulia Panayotova
- Health Psychology Research Center, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Tatyana Kotzeva
- Health Psychology Research Center, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Anna Foss
- Rachel Greenley
- Letizia Bartolini
- Giusy Iorio
- Qualitative Research and Citizen Science Unit, Azienda USL, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Cláudia Gouvinhas
- Florian Nicula
- Alexandra Tolnai
- Vanessa Moore
- Isabel Mosquera Metcalfe
- Violette Delisle
- Irina Todorova
- Health Psychology Research Center, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Helena Ros Comesana
- Meritxel Mallafré-Larrosa
- Ginevra Papi
- Nicoleta-Monica Pașca
- Psychology, Universitatea Babes-Bolyai Facultatea de Psihologie si Stiinte ale Educatiei, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- Christiane Dascher-Nadel
- Olivra Djuric
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090631
- Journal volume & issue
-
Vol. 15,
no. 1
Abstract
Objective This study explored and compared stakeholder perspectives on enhancements to cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women across seven European countries.Design In a series of Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to collaborate on identifying facilitators to improve cervical cancer screening.Setting This study was part of the CBIG-SCREEN project which is funded by the European Union and targets disparities in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.Participants Represented stakeholders at various levels, including user representatives (vulnerable women), healthcare professionals, social workers, programme managers and decision makers.Methods 14 meetings lasting 2 hours each were held in these seven countries between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were audio or video recorded, transcribed and translated into English for qualitative framework analysis.Results We engaged 120 participants in the Collaborative User Boards. Proposed solutions targeted both provider and system levels. In all countries, fostering trusting relationships between vulnerable women and social or healthcare professionals, coupled with community outreach for awareness and access to testing was a consistent recommendation. Participants in Estonia, Denmark, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania advocated for tailoring healthcare services to meet the unique needs of vulnerable populations through a holistic approach. In Bulgaria and Romania, participants advocated for the need to secure free access, from screening to follow-up, and emphasised the need for organised screening with target population screening registries.Conclusion The study offers insights into stakeholders' recommendations for enhancing cervical cancer screening services for vulnerable women across seven European countries. Despite variations in the implementation level of population-based screening programmes, the imperative to optimise outreach and proximity work to improve cervical cancer screening resonated across all countries.