BMC Public Health (May 2022)

Civic engagement and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic

  • Rachel J. Topazian,
  • Adam S. Levine,
  • Emma E. McGinty,
  • Colleen L. Barry,
  • Hahrie Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13289-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To examine the relationship between civic association participation and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly whether different forms of engagement mitigate the increased rates of psychological distress throughout 2020. Methods Panel survey data collected from a nationally representative cohort of 1222 U.S. adults. Data was collected in three waves in April, July, and November 2020. Psychological distress was measured using the validated Kessler-6 instrument in November 2020. Results Respondents belonging to political associations were more likely to experience psychological distress (difference in predicted level of psychological distress on a 0-1 scale: 0.098, p ≤ .05) relative to those in unknown associations. However, individuals in political associations who more frequently interacted with others had lower levels of psychological distress (−.065, p ≤ .05) compared to those in political associations with less frequent interactions. Conclusions Civic engagement that facilitates interpersonal interactions may protect against psychological distress.

Keywords