Scientific Reports (Jun 2024)

Prognostic scoring system based on indicators reflecting the tumor glandular differentiation and microenvironment for patients with colorectal cancer

  • Toshinori Kobayashi,
  • Mitsuaki Ishida,
  • Hisanori Miki,
  • Nobuyuki Yamamoto,
  • Takashi Harino,
  • Takuki Yagyu,
  • Soshi Hori,
  • Masahiko Hatta,
  • Yuki Hashimoto,
  • Masaya Kotsuka,
  • Makoto Yamasaki,
  • Kentaro Inoue,
  • Yoshinobu Hirose,
  • Mitsugu Sekimoto

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-65015-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Prognostic stratification is an urgent concern for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The desmoplastic reaction (DR) is speculated to mirror the tumor microenvironment. DR types are considered independent prognostic indicators in CRC, but have not been incorporated in previous prognostic nomograms. We aimed to assess the prognostic significance of a novel approach incorporating histopathological indicators reflecting tumor glandular differentiation and microenvironment. We evaluated 329 consecutive patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection at Kansai Medical University. Histological glandular differentiation was scored as 2 (0 point), 3 (1 point), or 4 (2 points). Tumor buddings (TBs) were classified as TB1 (0 point), TB2 (1 point), or TB3 (2 points). pT1 or 2 was considered as 0 point, pT3 or 4 + DR non-immature type as 1 point, and pT3 or 4 + DR immature type as 2 points. Lymph node metastasis was classified as pN0 (0 point), pN1 (1 point), or pN2 (2 points). The preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels were categorized as < 5.0 ng/mL (0 point) and ≧5.0 (1 point). Considering these factors, the following D&M (tumor differentiation and microenvironment) scoring system was applied: I (0–2 points), II (3–4 points), III (5–6 points), and IV (7–9 points). Kaplan–Meier curves showed significant differences in disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival among the assigned scores, highlighting their enhanced utility compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system. The D&M scoring system was valuable as the initial prognostic nomogram, including DR.