Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (Jan 2023)

Use of population health data to promote equitable recruitment for a primary care practice implementation trial addressing unhealthy alcohol use

  • Alex H. Krist,
  • Alison N. Huffstetler,
  • Gabriela Villalobos,
  • Michelle S. Rockwell,
  • Alicia Richards,
  • Adam Funk,
  • Roy T. Sabo,
  • Beth Bortz,
  • Ben Webel,
  • Jong Hyung Lee,
  • Kyle Russel,
  • Anton Kuzel,
  • Jaqueline B. Britz,
  • F. Gerard Moeller

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.530
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background: Recruiting underrepresented people and communities in research is essential for generalizable findings. Ensuring representative participants can be particularly challenging for practice-level dissemination and implementation trials. Novel use of real-world data about practices and the communities they serve could promote more equitable and inclusive recruitment. Methods: We used a comprehensive primary care clinician and practice database, the Virginia All-Payers Claims Database, and the HealthLandscape Virginia mapping tool with community-level socio-ecological information to prospectively inform practice recruitment for a study to help primary care better screen and counsel for unhealthy alcohol use. Throughout recruitment, we measured how similar study practices were to primary care on average, mapped where practices’ patients lived, and iteratively adapted our recruitment strategies. Results: In response to practice and community data, we adapted our recruitment strategy three times; first leveraging relationships with residency graduates, then a health system and professional organization approach, followed by a community-targeted approach, and a concluding approach using all three approaches. We enrolled 76 practices whose patients live in 97.3% (1844 of 1907) of Virginia’s census tracts. Our overall patient sample had similar demographics to the state for race (21.7% vs 20.0% Black), ethnicity (9.5% vs 10.2% Hispanic), insurance status (6.4% vs 8.0% uninsured), and education (26.0% vs 32.5% high school graduate or less). Each practice recruitment approach uniquely included different communities and patients. Discussion: Data about primary care practices and the communities they serve can prospectively inform research recruitment of practices to yield more representative and inclusive patient cohorts for participation.

Keywords