Journal of Clinical Medicine (Mar 2022)

Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio: An Objective Measure to Guide against Overcorrection of a Main Thoracic Curve in the Setting of a Structural Proximal Thoracic Curve

  • Matthew R. Landrum,
  • Andrew H. Milby,
  • Burt Yaszay,
  • Stefan Parent,
  • Susan E. Nelson,
  • Joshua M. Pahys,
  • Amer F. Samdani,
  • Anthony C. Capraro,
  • John M. Flynn,
  • Patrick J. Cahill,
  • on behalf of the Harms Study Group and Harms Non-Fusion Study Group

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061545
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 6
p. 1545

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: The correction of double thoracic (Lenke 2) curves has been associated with higher rates of postoperative shoulder imbalance that may compromise long-term outcomes following spinal deformity correction. A number of methods have been proposed to mitigate this risk, though no accepted standard measurement exists. The purpose of this study is to validate a novel quantitative method of determining the relative curve correction magnitude in double thoracic curves. Methods: Retrospective data from a multi-center database of patients undergoing surgical correction of left-proximal thoracic, right-main thoracic Lenke 2 curves were analyzed. A novel measurement tool, the Thoracic Curve Correction Ratio (TCCR), was applied for the purposes of validation against historical data. Results: A total of 305 patients with complete two-year follow-up data were included. The TCCR, or the ratio of postoperative percent correction of the thoracic curves divided by the ratio of the preoperative curve magnitudes, displayed a significant negative correlation (Pearson R = −0.66; p < 0.001) with T1 tilt at two years postoperatively. Conclusions: The TCCR could be added as an important factor in the preoperative planning process and intraoperative assessment in order to reduce postoperative T1 tilt. While T1 tilt remains an imperfect surrogate measure for clinical shoulder balance, it serves as one of many potential measures that the surgeon may evaluate quantitatively and radiographically.

Keywords