Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (May 2024)

Client's understanding of instructions for small animals in a veterinary neurological referral center

  • Thomas Flegel,
  • Katharina Dobersek,
  • Sabrina Bayer,
  • Lisa F. Becker,
  • Shenja Loderstedt,
  • Irene C. Böttcher,
  • Josephine Dietzel,
  • Carina Tästensen,
  • Theresa Kalliwoda,
  • Marie A. Harkenthal,
  • Andreas Kühnapfel,
  • Vivian Weiß,
  • Sarah Gutmann

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17085
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 38, no. 3
pp. 1639 – 1650

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background It is not known how much information clients retrieve from discharge instructions. Objective To investigate client's understanding of discharge instructions and influencing factors. Animals Dogs and cats being hospitalized for neurological diseases. Methods Clients were presented questionnaires regarding their pet's disease, diagnostics, treatments, prognosis and discharge instructions at time of discharge and 2 weeks later. The same questions were answered by discharging veterinarians at time of discharge. Clients answered additional questions regarding the subjective feelings during discharge conversation. Data collected included: data describing discharging veterinarian (age, gender, years of clinical experience, specialist status), data describing the client (age, gender, educational status). Raw percentage of agreement (RPA) between answers of clinicians and clients as well as factors potentially influencing the RPA were evaluated. Results Of 230 clients being approached 151 (65.7%) and 70 (30.4%) clients responded to the first and second questionnaire, respectively (130 dog and 30 cat owners). The general RPA between clinician's and client's responses over all questions together was 68.9% and 66.8% at the 2 time points. Questions regarding adverse effects of medication (29.0%), residual clinical signs (35.8%), and confinement instructions (36.8%) had the lowest RPAs at the first time point. The age of clients (P = .008) negatively influenced RPAs, with clients older than 50 years having lower RPA. Conclusions and Clinical Importance Clients can only partially reproduce information provided at discharge. Only clients' increasing age influenced recall of information. Instructions deemed to be important should be specifically stressed during discharge.

Keywords