Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Dec 2023)

Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Complication Rates after Minimally Invasive vs Open Calcaneal Osteotomy

  • Tammy Phillips MD,
  • SarahRose Hall BA,
  • Rodrigo Encinas MD,
  • David Edelman MD,
  • J. Benjamin Jackson MD, MBA,
  • Tyler Gonzalez MD, MBA

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00099
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Category: Hindfoot; Other Introduction/Purpose: Minimally invasive (MIS) percutaneous calcaneal osteotomy has been increasingly investigated as a potentially safe alternative to open calcaneal osteotomy due to reduced postoperative complication and decreased pain compared to an open procedure. This retrospective chart review aims to evaluate the postoperative outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing MIS vs. open calcaneal osteotomy. Methods: IRB approval was obtained. The study was performed by 2 fellowship-trained orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. 20 patients underwent MIS percutaneous calcaneal osteotomy, and 33 patients underwent open calcaneal osteotomy. All cases were completed between March 2021 and February 2023. Patient charts were reviewed for outcome data including complication rate, union rate, revision rate, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores. Results: Average follow up for the MIS group was 130.4 days and 258.2 days for the open group. The MIS group was found to have a lower rate of revision, infection, and sural neuritis (0%, 5%, and 10%) compared to the open group (3%, 13.3%, and 16.7%). All participants achieved union. Average preoperative PROMIS scores in the domains of physical function, pain interference, and mobility for the MIS group were 36.8 (28.6-46), 67.1 (54.3-78), and 34.6 (25-40). Average postoperative PROMIS scores for the MIS group were 35.7 (21-76), 62.3 (39-76), and 33.4 (16-75). In the open group, preoperative PROMIS scores in these same domains were 37.0 (22.4-49.8), 65.2 (54.3-77.8), and 35.0 (19-56), whereas they were 39.6 (19-56), 60.0 (39-72), and 37.4 (16-53) postoperatively. Conclusion: MIS percutaneous calcaneal osteotomy appears to be an efficacious and safe treatment with lower rates of revision, infection, and nerve injury compared to an open procedure. Early outcome measures show comparable PROMIS scores in all three domains of physical function, pain interference, and mobility following MIS percutaneous calcaneal osteotomy when compared to standard open calcaneal osteotomy. Surgeons may consider MIS percutaneous calcaneal osteotomy as an alternative to open calcaneal osteotomy when treating hindfoot deformities.