The Non-Place of Eros. On John Keats and the Logic of Flowers and Bees

Abstract

The following article investigatesKeats’sexpansion of thenotionof Eros, arguing that it forms a dialectic relation between the self-sufficiency of the lover and a dreamof mutual exchange between the subject and its object of desire. In order to discern thespecific concerns of Keats in this regard, the studyanalyzesaletter sent to his friendJohnHamiltonReynoldson the 19th of February 1818, suggesting that it constitutes a paradigmatic focal point from which a Keatsian logic of desiremay be subsequently outlined. The letter in question is well known to romantic scholars, famous for its positing and purported contrasting of two different modes of subjectivity: that of the flower, and that of thebee. As I want to contend, however, the issues of subjectivity raised by this text have not been adequately addressed, either with regard to their psychological or literary significance. Tracing the bee motif historically, the article discusses its appropriation by Keats, in order to highlight its problematical role in his lyrical work. Against this background, the letter toReynolds is shown to exemplify a conflicting, utopian, discourse of being and loving: a non-place of Eros.

Keywords

• apiculture
• roland barthes
• chronophilia
• chronophobia
• desire
• utopia