Journal of Clinical and Translational Science (Jan 2023)

Uncovering key clinical trial features influencing recruitment

  • Betina Idnay,
  • Yilu Fang,
  • Alex Butler,
  • Joyce Moran,
  • Ziran Li,
  • Junghwan Lee,
  • Casey Ta,
  • Cong Liu,
  • Chi Yuan,
  • Huanyao Chen,
  • Edward Stanley,
  • George Hripcsak,
  • Elaine Larson,
  • Karen Marder,
  • Wendy Chung,
  • Brenda Ruotolo,
  • Chunhua Weng

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.623
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the foundation for medical advances, but participant recruitment remains a persistent barrier to their success. This retrospective data analysis aims to (1) identify clinical trial features associated with successful participant recruitment measured by accrual percentage and (2) compare the characteristics of the RCTs by assessing the most and least successful recruitment, which are indicated by varying thresholds of accrual percentage such as ≥ 90% vs ≤ 10%, ≥ 80% vs ≤ 20%, and ≥ 70% vs ≤ 30%. Methods: Data from the internal research registry at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Aggregated Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov were collected for 393 randomized interventional treatment studies closed to further enrollment. We compared two regularized linear regression and six tree-based machine learning models for accrual percentage (i.e., reported accrual to date divided by the target accrual) prediction. The outperforming model and Tree SHapley Additive exPlanations were used for feature importance analysis for participant recruitment. The identified features were compared between the two subgroups. Results: CatBoost regressor outperformed the others. Key features positively associated with recruitment success, as measured by accrual percentage, include government funding and compensation. Meanwhile, cancer research and non-conventional recruitment methods (e.g., websites) are negatively associated with recruitment success. Statistically significant subgroup differences (corrected p-value < .05) were found in 15 of the top 30 most important features. Conclusion: This multi-source retrospective study highlighted key features influencing RCT participant recruitment, offering actionable steps for improvement, including flexible recruitment infrastructure and appropriate participant compensation.

Keywords