Should Patients with Waldenström Macroglobulinemia Receive a BTK Inhibitor as Frontline Therapy?

Abstract

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma with heterogeneous clinical presentation. As there are no randomised trials suggesting the best treatment option in treatment-naive patients, guidelines suggest either rituximab-combining regimens or BTK-inhibitors (BTKi) as feasible alternatives. Several factors play in the decision-making process: patients’ age and fitness, disease characteristics and genotype. Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) represents a fixed-duration, less expensive and effective option, able to achieve prolonged time-to-next treatment even in patients with unfavourable genotypes. Immunosuppression and treatment-related second cancers may represent serious concerns. Proteasome-inhibitor-based regimens are effective with rapid disease control, although bortezomib-related neuropathy discourages the choice of these agents and treatment schedules may not be easily manageable in the elderly. BTKi have demonstrated high rates of response and prolonged survival together with the convenience of an oral administration and limited cytopenias. However, outcomes are impacted by genotype and some concerns remain, in particular the continuous drug exposure that may result in extra-haematological complications and drug resistance. Although next-generation BTKi have improved treatment tolerance, the question whether BTKi should be offered as frontline therapy to every patient is still debated. Giving fixed-duration schedule, prolonged time-to-next treatment and outcomes independent of genotype, CIT is still our preferred choice in WM. However, BTKi remain a valuable option in frail patients unsuitable for CIT.

Keywords

• Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
• treatment-naive
• chemoimmunotherapy
• proteasome inhibitors
• bortezomib
• BTK inhibitors