Advances in Radiation Oncology (Nov 2024)

Impact of Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation of Organs at Risk in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

  • Solomon Kibudde, MBChB, MMed,
  • Awusi Kavuma, PhD,
  • Yao Hao, PhD,
  • Tianyu Zhao, PhD,
  • Hiram Gay, MD,
  • Jacaranda Van Rheenen, PhD,
  • Pavan Mukesh Jhaveri, MD,
  • Minjmaa Minjgee, MD, PhD,
  • Enkhsetseg Vanchinbazar, MSc,
  • Urdenekhuu Nansalmaa, MD, PhD, MPH,
  • Baozhou Sun, PhD, MBA, DABR

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 11
p. 101638

Abstract

Read online

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) processes require significant human resources and expertise, creating a barrier to rapid RT deployment in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Accurate segmentation of tumor targets and organs at risk (OARs) is crucial for optimal RT. This study assessed the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-based autosegmentation of OARs in 2 LMICs. Methods and Materials: Ten patients, comprising 5 head and neck (HN) cancer patients and 5 prostate cancer patients, were randomly selected. Planning computed tomography images were subjected to autosegmentation using an Food and Drug Administration-approved AI software tool and manual segmentation by experienced radiation oncologists from 2 LMIC RT clinics. The control data, obtained from a large academic institution in the United States, consisted of contours obtained by an experienced radiation oncologist. The segmentation time, DICE similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance, and mean surface distance were evaluated. Results: AI significantly reduced segmentation time, averaging 2 minutes per patient, compared with 57 to 84 minutes for manual contouring in LMICs. Compared with the control data, the AI pelvic contours provided better agreement than did the LMIC manual contours (mean DSC of 0.834 vs 0.807 in LMIC1 and 0.844 vs 0.801 in LMIC2). For HN contours, AI provided better agreement for the majority of OAR contours than manual contours in LMIC1 (mean DSC: 0.823 vs 0.821) or LMIC2 (mean DSC: 0.792 vs 0.748). Neither the AI nor LMIC manual contours had good agreement with the control data (DSC < 0.600) for the optic nerves, chiasm, and cochlea. Conclusions: AI-based autosegmentation generates OAR contours of comparable quality to manual segmentation for both pelvic and HN cancer patients in LMICs, with substantial time savings.