PLoS ONE (Jan 2013)

Rabies and canine distemper virus epidemics in the red fox population of northern Italy (2006-2010).

  • Pierre Nouvellet,
  • Christl A Donnelly,
  • Marco De Nardi,
  • Chris J Rhodes,
  • Paola De Benedictis,
  • Carlo Citterio,
  • Federica Obber,
  • Monica Lorenzetto,
  • Manuela Dalla Pozza,
  • Simon Cauchemez,
  • Giovanni Cattoli

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061588
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 4
p. e61588

Abstract

Read online

Since 2006 the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) population in north-eastern Italy has experienced an epidemic of canine distemper virus (CDV). Additionally, in 2008, after a thirteen-year absence from Italy, fox rabies was re-introduced in the Udine province at the national border with Slovenia. Disease intervention strategies are being developed and implemented to control rabies in this area and minimise risk to human health. Here we present empirical data and the epidemiological picture relating to these epidemics in the period 2006-2010. Of important significance for epidemiological studies of wild animals, basic mathematical models are developed to exploit information collected from the surveillance program on dead and/or living animals in order to assess the incidence of infection. These models are also used to estimate the rate of transmission of both diseases and the rate of vaccination, while correcting for a bias in early collection of CDV samples. We found that the rate of rabies transmission was roughly twice that of CDV, with an estimated effective contact between infected and susceptible fox leading to a new infection occurring once every 3 days for rabies, and once a week for CDV. We also inferred that during the early stage of the CDV epidemic, a bias in the monitoring protocol resulted in a positive sample being almost 10 times more likely to be collected than a negative sample. We estimated the rate of intake of oral vaccine at 0.006 per day, allowing us to estimate that roughly 68% of the foxes would be immunised. This was confirmed by field observations. Finally we discuss the implications for the eco-epidemiological dynamics of both epidemics in relation to control measures.