BMC Anesthesiology (Mar 2023)

Real-time evaluation of the independent analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine

  • XiaoHua Wang,
  • SiYuan Zhang,
  • Chunxiu Wang,
  • Yi Huang,
  • Hao Wu,
  • Guoguang Zhao,
  • TianLong Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02022-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 11

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Dexmedetomidine has analgesic properties, but the intraoperative analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine is often masked by the effects of other general anaesthetics. Therefore, the degree to which it reduces intraoperative pain intensity remains unclear. The objective of this double-blind, randomised controlled trial was to evaluate the independent intraoperative analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine in real-time. Methods This single-centre study enrolled 181 patients who were hospitalised for below-knee orthopaedic surgeries between 19 January 2021 to 3 August 2021 were eligible for this is single-centre study. Peripheral neural block was performed on patients scheduled for below-knee orthopaedic surgeries. Patients were randomly assigned to the dexmedetomidine or midazolam group and were intravenously administered with 1.5 µg kg−1 h−1 dexmedetomidine or 50 µg kg−1 h−1 midazolam, respectively. The analgesic efficacy was evaluated using the real-time non-invasive nociception monitoring. The primary endpoint was the attainment rate of the nociception index target. The secondary endpoints included the occurrence of intraoperative hypoxemia, haemodynamic parameters, the consciousness index, electromyography and patient outcomes. Results On Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the defined nociception index target was attained in 95.45% and 40.91% of patients receiving dexmedetomidine and midazolam, respectively. Log-rank analysis revealed that the dexmedetomidine group attained the nociception index target significantly faster and the median attainment time of the nociception index target in the dexmedetomidine group was 15 min. Dexmedetomidine group was associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypoxemia. There was no significant difference in blood pressure between the dexmedetomidine and midazolam groups. Further, the dexmedetomidine group had a lower maximum visual analogue scale score and lower analgesic consumption postoperatively. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine has independent analgesia and systemically administered as an adjuvant agent has better analgesic efficacy than midazolam without severe side effects. Trial registration clinicaltrial.gov Registry Identifier: NCT-04675372.Registered on 19/12 /2020.

Keywords