Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management (Jul 2024)
Analysis of Oxygen Concentration in the Oral Cavity During Intravenous Sedation with Intranasal Oxygen Administration for Dental Treatment
Abstract
Shota Abe,1 Akira Furuyama,2 Kenji Ohsuga,2 Shinya Yamazaki,1 Hiroyoshi Kawaai1,2 1Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Ohu University, School of Dentistry, Koriyama City, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan; 2Department of Oral Physiology and Biochemistry, Ohu University, School of Dentistry, Koriyama City, Fukushima Prefecture, JapanCorrespondence: Hiroyoshi Kawaai, Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Ohu University School of Dentistry, 31-1 Misumido, Tomita, Koriyama City, Fukushima, 963-8611, Japan, Tel +81-24-932-9337, Email [email protected]: Intravenous sedation (IVS) with propofol (PPF) is commonly performed in dental treatment, particular in patients with dentophobia, with gag reflex, or undergoing implant surgeries, as PPF has the advantages of rapid induction and recovery. However, PPF and other intravenous sedatives may cause respiratory depression. Thus, IVS with PPF requires oxygen administration. But airway burn may occur when high-concentration oxygen is stored in the oral cavity and catches fire. For these reasons, the present study aimed to elucidate the changes in oxygen concentration (OC) under IVS with PPF and oxygen administration.Patients and methods: Nineteen healthy male volunteers participated in the study. None of them had missing teeth, nasal congestion, or temporomandibular joint dysfunction. They were sedated with a continuous PPF infusion dose of 6 mg/kg/hr for 25 min, followed by administration of 3 L/min oxygen via a nasal cannula. The OC was measured at two sites, namely, the median maxillary anterior teeth (MMAT) and median maxillary soft palate (MMSP), before PPF infusion (baseline) and 14, 15– 18 (Term 1), 19, and 20– 23 (Term 2) min after the start of infusion.Results: Compared with the values at baseline, the OC in the MMSP significantly increased at each time point, whereas the OC in the MMAT significantly increased at Term 2. Furthermore, in the comparison of the OC before and after the use of a mouth prop, the OC exhibited an upward trend, but no statistically significant differences were observed between the two time points in the MMAT and MMSP. In IVS with PPF and oxygen administration, the OC in the pharynx increases as the sedative level deepens.Conclusion: Oxygen administration should be temporarily discontinued, and suction should be performed to decrease the OC in the oral cavity when sparking procedures during IVS with PPF and oxygen administration are performed.Keywords: nasal cannula, propofol, mouth prop, airway fire, upper airway obstruction
