Neurology and Therapy (Sep 2023)

Burden of Medication Overuse in Migraine: A Cross-sectional, Population-Based Study in Five European Countries Using the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS)

  • Agnete Skovlund Dissing,
  • Xin Ying Lee,
  • Ole Østerberg,
  • Lene Hammer-Helmich

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00545-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 6
pp. 2053 – 2065

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Overuse of medication to treat migraine attacks can lead to development of a new type of headache or significant worsening of pre-existing headache, known as medication overuse headache. However, data concerning the burden of medication overuse (MO) in migraine are limited. This study aimed to assess the humanistic burden of MO in individuals with migraine from five European countries. Methods Data are from the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey—a cross-sectional, population-based survey conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Data were included from adults (≥ 18 years) with a self-reported diagnosis of migraine and at least one migraine attack and one headache in the past 30 days. MO was defined as (i) use of simple analgesics/over-the-counter medications on ≥ 15 days/month; or (ii) use of migraine medication, including combination analgesics, on ≥ 10 days/month. Humanistic burden of MO was assessed using the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12v2), EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D), Short-Form 6-Dimensions (SF-6D), and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). The association of MO with humanistic burden was evaluated using generalized linear models adjusted for potential confounders in the full migraine population and in subgroups defined by headache frequency (monthly headache days [MHDs] 1–3, 4–7, 8–14, or ≥ 15). Results Among individuals with migraine, humanistic burden (SF-12v2, SF-6D, EQ-5D, and MIDAS) was higher in individuals who reported MO (n = 431) versus no MO (n = 3554), even after adjustment for confounding variables (p < 0.001 for all measures). MIDAS and EQ-5D scores were higher in individuals with MO than without, at all levels of headache frequency. For SF-12v2 and SF-6D, differences between groups with/without MO were seen only at lower levels of headache frequency (MHD 1–3 and 4–7). Conclusion Among people with migraine, those who report MO face a greater humanistic burden than those without MO, irrespective of headache frequency.

Keywords