Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Bullectomy and Partial Pleurectomy versus Chest Tube Drainage for Treatment of Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax—A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

Abstract

Background and objective: Current guidelines recommend chest tube (CT) drainage as the initial treatment of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP). Surgery should be considered in cases of persistent air leak or recurrent disease. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is nowadays an established surgical treatment for complicated spontaneous pneumothorax. However, reports on VATS-bullectomy with partial pleurectomy (VBPP) for treatment of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax (SSP) are limited. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of patients with secondary pneumothorax treated either by VBPP or CT drainage in our institution. Secondly, we assessed underlying clinical parameters to identify potential risk factors for SSP recurrence. Materials and Methods: Eighty-two patients were included in this study. Long-term recurrence rates and potential risk factors for SSP recurrence were analyzed. Results: Thirty-six patients (43.9%) underwent VBPP, whereas 46 (56.1%) patients subsequently underwent CT treatment. During a median follow-up period of 76.5 months, VBPP patients experienced a significantly low recurrence rate compared to CT patients (VBPP vs. CT: 16.7% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.016). However, VBPP was associated with a higher complication rate and significantly longer length of hospital stay (LOS). Male sex (male vs. female: p = 0.021) and CT treatment (VBPP vs. CT: p Conclusions: VBPP is a suitable surgical treatment for SSP. However, prolonged LOS and possible complications should be discussed prior to VBPP.

Keywords

• VATS-bullectomy
• partial pleurectomy
• chest tube
• recurrence
• SSP