Case Studies in Thermal Engineering (Dec 2024)
The performance analysis of a compressed air energy storage (CAES) for peak moving with cooling, heating, and power production
Abstract
This study focuses on modeling and optimizing a multifaceted geothermal-based energy production system within the context of Denmark. The primary objectives revolve around enhancing system efficiency and reducing operational costs. The system under investigation comprises geothermal components, an organic Rankine cycle, a compressed air energy storage facility, and an absorption chiller. The organic Rankine cycle operates using refrigerants R123 and ammonia, effectively converting thermal energy into electricity and thermal energy for various applications. Optimization was carried out employing the Response Surface Method in tandem with Design-Expert software, facilitating the fine-tuning of objective functions. Two key objectives were selected: Exergy Round Trip Efficiency and cost rate, aimed at improving technical performance and curbing economic expenditure. A range of design variables were considered for optimization, including turbine and pump inlet temperatures, geothermal mass flow rate, turbine and pump efficiencies, compressor and gas turbine efficiency, inlet pressure to the compressed air energy storage tank, and evaporator pinch point temperature. The system reached an impressive exergy efficiency peak of 77.98 %, accompanied by a modest cost rate of 5.48 $/h. The costliest components in the system were the compressed air energy storage unit, followed closely by organic Rankine cycle 1 and organic Rankine cycle 2. In contemplating the practical implementation of this innovative energy system, ten cities in Denmark underwent rigorous analysis, accounting for technical and economic factors. Subsequent assessments identified Aarhus as the optimal location to initiate the system. The environmental results showed that by producing 13981.9 MW of electricity annually in Arhus City, it is possible to help reduce CO2 emissions by 2853.2 tons of CO2/year and avoid environmental costs of 68455.3 $/year. The environmental assessment also highlighted the potential for substantial green space expansion, estimating an additional 13 ha of green areas in the city of Aarhus, Denmark.
