Comprehensive and Accurate Molecular Profiling of Breast Cancer through mRNA Expression of <i>ESR1</i>, <i>PGR</i>, <i>ERBB2</i>, <i>MKI67</i>, and a Novel Proliferation Signature
Anne-Sophie Wegscheider,
Joanna Gorniak,
Sara Rollinson,
Leanne Gough,
Navdeep Dhaliwal,
Agustin Guardiola,
Anna Gasior,
Denise Helmer,
Zoe Pounce,
Axel Niendorf
Affiliations
Anne-Sophie Wegscheider
MVZ Prof. Dr. Med. A. Niendorf Pathologie Hamburg-West GmbH, Institute for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Lornsenstr. 4, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
Joanna Gorniak
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Sara Rollinson
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Leanne Gough
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Navdeep Dhaliwal
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Agustin Guardiola
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Anna Gasior
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Denise Helmer
MVZ Prof. Dr. Med. A. Niendorf Pathologie Hamburg-West GmbH, Institute for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Lornsenstr. 4, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
Zoe Pounce
APIS Assay Technologies Ltd., Second Floor, Citylabs 1.0, Nelson Street, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
Axel Niendorf
MVZ Prof. Dr. Med. A. Niendorf Pathologie Hamburg-West GmbH, Institute for Histology, Cytology and Molecular Diagnostics, Lornsenstr. 4, 22767 Hamburg, Germany
Background: An accurate status determination of breast cancer biomarkers (ER, PR, HER2, Ki67) is crucial for guiding patient management. The “gold standard” for assessing these biomarkers in FFPE tissue is IHC, which faces challenges in standardization and exhibits substantial variability. In this study, we compare the concordance of a new commercial RT-qPCR kit with IHC in determining BC biomarker status. Methods: The performance was evaluated using 634 FFPE specimens, which underwent histological analysis in accordance with standard of care methods. HER2 2+ tumors were referred to ISH testing. An immunoreactive score of ≥2/12 was considered positive for ER/PR and 20% staining was used as a cut-off for Ki67 high/low score. RT-qPCR and results calling were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results: High concordance with IHC was seen for all markers (93.2% for ER, 87.1% for PR, 93.9% for HER2, 77.9% for Ki67 and 80.1% for proliferative signature (assessed against Ki67 IHC)). Conclusions: By assessing the concordance with the results obtained through IHC, we sought to demonstrate the reliability and utility of the kit for precise BC subtyping. Our findings suggest that the kit provides a highly precise and accurate quantitative assessment of BC biomarkers.