‘Alles is van ons’. Anonieme brieven over de voedselvoorziening in Nederland tijdens de Tweede Wereldoorlog

BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review. 2011;126(3):25-51 DOI 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.7379


Journal Homepage

Journal Title: BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review

ISSN: 0165-0505 (Print); 2211-2898 (Online)

Publisher: Utrecht University Library Open Access Journals (Publishing Services)

Society/Institution: Royal Netherlands Historical Society, Koninklijk Nederlands Historisch Genootschap(KNHG)

LCC Subject Category: History (General) and history of Europe: History of Low Countries - Benelux Countries

Country of publisher: Netherlands

Language of fulltext: English, Dutch

Full-text formats available: PDF, XML



A. Vrints


Double blind peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 40 weeks


Abstract | Full Text

<p><strong><em>‘Everything is Ours’: Anonymous Letters concerning the Food Supply in the Netherlands during World War II<br /></em></strong>The input of the Dutch population in the formation of food policy in the Netherlands during World War II is often unduly neglected. People did not simply undergo policies from above, but actively tried to exert influence on these. Writing anonymous letters was one of the strategies used to this end. A corpus of anonymous letters sent between 1940 and 1944 to the head of the Dutch rationing authority offers rare alternative access to the moral codes and perceptions of the food issue at grass-roots level in the occupied Netherlands before the Hunger Winter. The analysis of this corpus of anonymous letters confirms the existence of a strong anti-German Dutch consumer identity, but also goes to reveal a socially more complex image of the moral perceptions of the food issue in the occupied Netherlands. The letters show that the food issue gave birth to social tensions earlier than has generally been assumed. The image of anti-German unity masks a great deal of social division. Various social groups held different views on the food issue. The perceptions of these groups may have been diverse, but they all shared a preoccupation with equality.</p>