Judgment and Decision Making (May 2018)

Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?

  • Will M. Gervais,
  • Michiel van Elk,
  • Dimitris Xygalatas,
  • Ryan T. McKay,
  • Mark Aveyard,
  • Emma E. Buchtel,
  • Ilan Dar-Nimrod,
  • Eva Kundtová Klocová,
  • Jonathan E. Ramsay,
  • Tapani Riekki,
  • Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen,
  • Joseph Bulbulia

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007701
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13
pp. 268 – 274

Abstract

Read online

Religious belief is a topic of longstanding interest to psychological science, but the psychology of religious disbelief is a relative newcomer. One prominently discussed model is analytic atheism, wherein cognitive reflection, as measured with the Cognitive Reflection Test, overrides religious intuitions and instruction. Consistent with this model, performance-based measures of cognitive reflection predict religious disbelief in WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, & Democratic) samples. However, the generality of analytic atheism remains unknown. Drawing on a large global sample (N = 3461) from 13 religiously, demographically, and culturally diverse societies, we find that analytic atheism as usually assessed is in fact quite fickle cross-culturally, appearing robustly only in aggregate analyses and in three individual countries. The results provide additional evidence for culture’s effects on core beliefs.

Keywords