The influence of urine cytology on our practice

Abstract

Objective: Bladder cancer is a common malignancy. It is ranked ninth among male population in Saudi Arabia. Urine cytology is used by some physicians routinely in the workup for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with urothelial cancer. Our objective is to determine whether urine cytology is still essential in the work up of suspected urothelial cancer patients and to measure its cost-effectiveness. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all urine cytology reports that were performed over a period of five years from 2006 to 2010 in the International Medical Center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The medical records of patients with cytology reports of both positive for malignant cells and atypical cells suspicious of malignancy were retrospectively, studied for age, sex, nationality, cystoscopic findings, imaging results, and total cost. Results: A total of 563 urine cytology tests were done on 516 patients. Two patients were positive for malignant cell and 10 showed atypical cells suspicious of malignancy. All 12 patients underwent imaging and/or cystoscopy as part of their complete work up for hematuria. The two patients with positive cytology had a cystoscopic confirmation of bladder tumor. In the 10 patients with atypical cells, bladder tumor was identified in seven using cystoscopy and/or imaging. The mean age was 54.6±16 year (range 15-95). The total cost was 140,750 SR (37,533 USD) for a yield of 0.3% positive results and 2% atypical cytology. Conclusion: Routine urine cytology did not affect the diagnostic strategy for urothelial cancer. It should be only used in selected patients.

Keywords

• Hematuria
• transitional cell carcinoma
• urine cytology
• urine markers
• urothelial cancer