Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics (Sep 2018)

Payment drivers in Medicare patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty

  • Daniel Cunningham MD, MPH,
  • Samuel Adams MD,
  • Mark Easley MD,
  • Vasili Karas MD,
  • James DeOrio MD

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011418S00196
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3

Abstract

Read online

Category: Ankle Arthritis Introduction/Purpose: The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model (CJR) provides bundled payments for in-hospital and 90-day post-discharge care of patients undergoing total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Defining patient factors associated with increased costs during TAA could help refine patient selection strategies and identify modifiable preoperative patient factors that can be addressed prior to the patient entering the bundle. Methods: This study is part of an IRB-approved single-center observational study of patients undergoing TAA from 1/1/2012 to 12/15/2016. Patients were included if they met CJR criteria for inclusion into the bundled payment model and had Medicare as the insurance payer. Costs related to readmissions, diagnosis, and procedures that had been excluded by CJR were also excluded from this financial analysis. All inpatient and outpatient payments beginning at the index procedure through 90 days postoperatively were identified. Patient medical profile including Charlson-Deyo and Elixhauser comorbidity scores, preoperative comorbidities, and perioperative factors were then completed based on institutional data and chart review. Additionally, post-discharge disposition, readmissions, emergency department (ED) utilization, and outpatient plastic surgery consultation were recorded within the 90-day bundled payment period. Results: Out of 199 patients with Medicare payments in the study timeframe, 137 had consented to the study and were analyzed. Baseline and operative characteristics are given in Table 1. Increased length of stay (LOS) at the initial procedure, increased Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease were significantly associated with higher payments. Discharge to skilled nursing facility (skilled nursing facility), admissions, ED visits, and wound complications were significant drivers of payment. Conclusion: Increased Charlson-Deyo score and vascular disease along with increased LOS were associated with increased payments from Medicare. Discharge to SNF, readmission, ED visits, and wound complications considerably increased payments. This study identifies the relationship between patient profile and increased financial burden, highlighting the potential utility of pre-operative mitigation of modifiable risk factors and stratification of payments based on patient profile. Lastly, reducing rates of SNF placement, readmission, ED visitation, and wound complications are targets for decreasing costs for patients undergoing TAA.