Frontiers in Psychiatry (Apr 2015)

Reducing Delusional Conviction Through a Cognitive-Based Group Training Game: A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

  • Yasser eKhazaal,
  • anne eChatton,
  • Kren eDieben,
  • Philippe eHuguelet,
  • maria eboucherie,
  • gregoire emonney,
  • Laurent eLecardeur,
  • virginie eSalamin,
  • Fethi eBretel,
  • silke eazoulay,
  • elodie ePesenti,
  • Raoul eKrychowsk,
  • andrea eCosta Prata,
  • Javier eBartolomei,
  • Perrine eBrazo,
  • Thomas eCharpeaud,
  • alexei eTraian,
  • elodie eMurys,
  • florent epoupart,
  • serge erouvière,
  • Daniele eZullino,
  • Alberto eParabiaghi,
  • Mohamed eSaoud,
  • jerôme eFavrod

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2015.00066
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6

Abstract

Read online

AbstractObjective: Michael’s Game is a card game targeting the ability to generate alternative hypotheses to explain a given experience. The main objective was to evaluate the effect of MG on delusional conviction as measured by the primary study outcome: the change in scores on the conviction subscale of the Peters Delusions Inventory (PDI-21). Other variables of interest were the change in scores on the distress and preoccupation subscales of the PDI-21, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, and belief flexibility assessed with the Maudsley Assessment of Delusions Schedule. Methods: We performed a parallel, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled superiority trial comparing treatment as usual plus participation in Michael’s Game (MG) with treatment as usual plus being on a waiting list (TAU) in a sample of adult outpatients with psychotic disorders and persistent positive psychotic symptoms at inclusion. Results: The 172 participants were randomised, with 86 included in each study arm. Assessments were performed at inclusion (T1: baseline), at 3 months (T2: post-treatment), and at 6 months after the second assessment (T3: follow-up). At T2, a positive treatment effect was observed on the primary outcome, the PDI-21 conviction subscale (p=0.005). At T3, a sustained effect was observed for the conviction subscale (p=0.002). Further effects were also observed at T3 on the PDI-21 distress (p=0.002) and preoccupation subscales (p=0.001), as well as on one of the MADS measures of belief flexibility (anything against the belief) (p=0.001). Conclusions: The study demonstrated some significant beneficial effect of MG. http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN37178153/Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation Grant 32003B-121038

Keywords