Clinical and Translational Medicine (Jan 2022)

Circular CPM promotes chemoresistance of gastric cancer via activating PRKAA2‐mediated autophagy

  • Lang Fang,
  • Jialun Lv,
  • Zhe Xuan,
  • Bowen Li,
  • Zheng Li,
  • Zhongyuan He,
  • Fengyuan Li,
  • Jianghao Xu,
  • Sen Wang,
  • Yiwen Xia,
  • Tianlu Jiang,
  • Lu Zhang,
  • Linjun Wang,
  • Diancai Zhang,
  • Hao Xu,
  • Li Yang,
  • Zekuan Xu,
  • Weizhi Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.708
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Chemotherapy can significantly improve the disease‐free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) is frequently applied in the clinic, acting as a first‐line chemotherapy drug of advanced GC, which could be used alone or combining platinum drugs. However, its efficacy is significantly attenuated by chemoresistance, which is associated with patients’ poor survival. Recently, there is evidence suggesting that dysregulation of autophagy may contribute to drug resistance in cancer, and circular RNAs (circRNAs) also take part in chemoresistance. However, whether circRNAs participate in 5‐FU chemoresistance through autophagy remains largely unknown. Methods RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics analysis were performed in GC. Sanger sequencing, Actinomycin D assay and RNase R assay confirmed the circular structure of circular CPM (circCPM). Various cell line models and animal models were used to explore related functions in vitro and in vivo. Quantitative Real‐time PCR (qRT‐PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization, ribonucleic acid; (RNA) pulldown assays, RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation assays and Luciferase reporter assays were applied to explore involved pathways. Results circCPM was up‐regulated in 5‐FU resistant GC cell lines and tissue. Moreover, high circCPM expression is positively associated with poor survival. Silencing circCPM greatly improved chemosensitivity in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, it directly binds to miR‐21‐3p in the cytoplasm and therefore increases the expression of PRKAA2, contributing to the activation of autophagy and chemoresistance. Conclusion Our results reveal that circCPM has a crucial role in regulating GC autophagy and 5‐FU resistance by targeting PRKAA2. It may function as a new theory basis for assessing the curative effect of GC and reversing 5‐FU chemoresistance.

Keywords