Blood Advances (Nov 2019)

Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of treatment strategies for CML with incorporation of treatment discontinuation

  • Chihiro Yamamoto,
  • Hirotomo Nakashima,
  • Takashi Ikeda,
  • Shin-ichiro Kawaguchi,
  • Yumiko Toda,
  • Shoko Ito,
  • Kiyomi Mashima,
  • Takashi Nagayama,
  • Kento Umino,
  • Daisuke Minakata,
  • Hirofumi Nakano,
  • Kaoru Morita,
  • Ryoko Yamasaki,
  • Miyuki Sugimoto,
  • Yuko Ishihara,
  • Masahiro Ashizawa,
  • Kaoru Hatano,
  • Kazuya Sato,
  • Iekuni Oh,
  • Shin-ichiro Fujiwara,
  • Masuzu Ueda,
  • Ken Ohmine,
  • Kazuo Muroi,
  • Yoshinobu Kanda

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 21
pp. 3266 – 3277

Abstract

Read online

Abstract: The cost of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a substantial economic burden. In Japan, imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib are now approved as first-line treatment of CML in chronic phase. Recent “stop TKI” trials have shown that TKIs can be safely discontinued in nearly one-half of patients with sustained deep molecular response (DMR). In this study, we analyzed the cost-effectiveness of a simulated 10 years of CML treatment including stop TKI in both the United States and Japan. We constructed Markov models to compare 4 strategies in which treatment was initiated with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or any of these TKIs at the physician's discretion. Treatment was switched to another TKI in the case of intolerance or resistance to the initial TKI, and TKIs were discontinued if DMR persisted for 2 years. “Imatinib first” offered 7.34 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at the cost of $1 022 148 in the United States (US dollars) and ¥32 526 785 in Japan (Japanese yen). In comparison with imatinib first, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per QALY of “dasatinib first” (7.68 QALY, $1 236 052, ¥51 506 254), “nilotinib first” (7.64 QALY, $1 245 667, ¥39 635 598), and “physician's choice” (7.55 QALY, $1 167 818, ¥41 187 740) was $641 324, $696 717, and $666 634 in the United States and ¥54 456 325, ¥23 154 465, and ¥39 635 615 in Japan, respectively. None of the 3 strategies met the willingness-to-pay threshold. The results were robust to univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses. Imatinib first was shown to be the most cost-effective approach even with the incorporation of stop TKI.