Indian Journal of Anaesthesia (May 2024)
Comparing the posture and comfort of anaesthesiologists during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in the head-elevated laryngoscopy position in supine position and with a 25° backup: A randomised clinical crossover trial
Abstract
Background and Aims: The head-elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP) and a 25° backup have been proposed to enhance glottic visualisation, yet concerns about ergonomic discomfort hinder their widespread adoption. This study compares the comfort and posture adopted by anaesthesiologists while performing laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation with patients in HELP while in a supine position or with 25° backup. Methods: The study included 48 patients aged 18–60 years with normal airways and 12 experienced anaesthesiologists. Patients were randomised into two groups using permuted block randomisation. Anaesthesiologists performed laryngoscopy and intubation in supine HELP and 25° backup HELP positions. Anaesthesiologist’s posture was determined by measuring the angles of neck, wrist, elbow, back and knee joints, which were compared using Student’s t-test, and subjective comfort assessed on a Likert scale was compared using the Chi-square test. As mentioned by the anaesthesiologist, Cormack- Lehane grading was also noted and compared using a Chi-square test between groups, taking a P value <0.05 as significant. Results: Both positions demonstrated comparable anaesthesiologist posture (P = 0.919) and comfort (P = 0.644). However, the 25° backup HELP positions significantly improved Cormack–Lehane grades, with 68% achieving grade 1 compared to 31% in the supine HELP group (P = 0.012). Haemodynamic stability and tracheal intubation time showed no significant differences between the groups (P = 0.475 and 0.117, respectively), and no complications were reported in either group. Conclusion: Anaesthesiologists’ posture and comfort during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are similar between supine and 25° backup in patients with easy airways.
Keywords
