PLoS ONE (Jan 2021)

A randomized phase I study comparing the pharmacokinetics of a bevacizumab (HD204) biosimilar to European Union- and United States of America-sourced bevacizumab.

  • Martin Demarchi,
  • Pierre Coliat,
  • Philippe Barthelemy,
  • Roland Schott,
  • Meher BenAbdelghani,
  • Michael Kim,
  • Jocelyn Chung Shii Hii,
  • Peggy Feyaerts,
  • Felicia Rui Xia Ang,
  • Marie Paule Derde,
  • Filip Deforce,
  • Thierry Petit,
  • Chris Schwabe,
  • Chris Wynne,
  • Lisa Soyeon Park,
  • Xavier Pivot

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248222
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 9
p. e0248222

Abstract

Read online

PurposeThis first-in-human study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) equivalence between HD204 and the European Union (EU)-sourced bevacizumab, between HD204 and the United States of America (US)-sourced bevacizumab, and between EU-sourced and US-sourced bevacizumab (NCT03390673).MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, 3-way parallel group, single-dose comparative PK study, healthy male subjects were randomized to receive a single 1 mg/kg intravenous dose of HD204, EU-sourced bevacizumab or US-sourced bevacizumab. PK parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods. PK equivalence was determined using the pre-defined equivalence margin of 0.8-1.25 in terms of AUC(0-∞) for the pairwise comparisons.FindingsBaseline demographics for the 119 randomized subjects were similar across the three groups. The 90% CIs for the ratio of the geometric means of HD204 to US-sourced bevacizumab, HD204 to EU-sourced bevacizumab, and EU-sourced to US-sourced bevacizumab were all within the interval of 80% to 125% for AUC0-inf, thus demonstrating equivalency in the PK properties for all three treatment groups. Similarly, the ratio of the geometric means for AUC0-last and Cmax were all within the 80% and 125% margins, supporting the robustness of the primary findings. All other PK parameters, including the half-life (t1⁄2) clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vd) and time of maximum concentration (tmax), were comparable. There was no difference between the 3 treatment arms in terms of vital signs, laboratory tests and adverse events. None of the subjects treated with HD204 had positive ADA results.ImplicationsHD204 demonstrates equivalent pharmacokinetic profiles compared to those of both US-sourced and EU-sourced bevacizumab. (NCT03390673).